England,
The U.S., Tiny Houses, DIY TV, France, Indie Cafes, Holland, PTAs.
The
global marketplace is going through radical change.
Some
brands are capitalizing on it.
Many more dwell in their corporate cells oblivious to the outside world.
In
high school, I participated in a special class program. We could study whatever topics we
wanted and it was up to the teachers to weave in the fundamental classes of
math, history, grammar, etc.
We
decided to study the physics of social change. The teachers liked it because it would incorporate
mathematics and history all together in one session of learning.
What
we learned quickly is how the forces of change are driven by natural physics to
seek out a sense of balance and how in the process, there are often radical
shifts in opposite direction.
Shifts magnified by the consistency of drive in the opposite direction.
Telecommunications
set the global stage of what we are experiencing as I write this blog. The
connectivity of people initially from across town moved quickly to
cross-country and eventually globally.
Today,
IoT (the Internet of Things) is producing a globalization that extends beyond
the unification of people to the unification of environments.
Yesterday
morning, I had coffee with a GenXer in Atlanta who currently works in real
estate. He’s a nice guy. He’s also a political Libertarian
convinced that the U.N. is on a mission of global unification.
He
voiced less concern about what form of governmental and economic modeling
global unification would take and more concern about the whole concept of
unification.
When
he voiced his concern, I quickly noted that his discomfort was not a disconnect with the fact that we were meeting at a café that was not Starbucks.
Kicking
off 2017, I am spending a lot of time working with several brands that are
having to step back and total re-engineer the operational mechanics of their
brand deliverables.
National
brands crafted their standardization model all the way down to their graphic
standards manual and hit the accelerator full speed forward in market roll-out.
I
vowed this year not to write a blog about the Super Bowl ads.
Too many folks now do it and the depth
level of commentary does not venture much deeper than the surface.
The
news media though has become pre-occupied in the Audi, 84 Lumber and AirBnB ads
that sought to voice political perspectives.
What’s
fascinating is that the very fact that brands elected to produce and run the
ads.
Those
brands might not be able to affect global change, but by damn, they are going
to at least take individual control and convey an unchallenged viewpoint in
that $2.5 million, 30-second time block.
Hollywood
does live in LA-LA-Land and while they cannot change the election, they can at
least locally deny its existence and pretend that they are effective agents of
change. Especially within the environment of broadcast and stage
performances.
And again, that is
their world where they control the stage!
Re-focus
on the controllable.
England,
The U.S., Tiny Houses, DIY TV, France, Indie Cafes, Holland, PTAs.
Seeking
a sense of local control, authorship and interconnectivity is driving a radical
refocus of relationship that transcends beyond other humans, but iconic
elements of identity and relationship.
And
that includes corporations and brands.
Telecommunications,
the Internet and social media connected individuals but also issues, problems
and encounters that cannot be managed nor resolved.
Like
it or not, but the dismantling of unified and packaged branding is taking place
in front of us.
Relationships
are re-establishing around experiential touch-points that are predictable and
manageable.
Not
only are Tiny Houses easy to transport and uproot, they are financially
own-able and the monolith, non-personal, automated mortgage firm is removed
from the experience.
Not
only are the Indie Cafes owned locally, the space and
people working in them are identifiable and conversational and local.
Whether
Boomers, Xers or Millennials, they all are saying screw even the third-party
contractors, I can do the work myself.
Political
parties are not getting it. Even
those that match the banner used by the candidates or issues that voters
approved. Here in the U.S., the
Republicans are just as stupid-blind as the Democrats in “getting it.”
Unification,
globalization, common values, universal brands… dead.
Uniqueness,
individuality, locality, personal connectivity… empowerment moving forward.
If
you are reading this… realize where you need to refocus attention…
1.
What is the character of your audience groups? Give up the perspective of thinking of a universal target
group… and further give up the belief that the individual groups universally
seek out the same brand experience.
2.
How can you operationally localize the brand? Is it in the physicality of presentation? Is it in the
personality of presentation? Is it
in the actual construction of the brand itself?
3.
How can the communications be personally engaging? And if you think
social media is the answer, go jump off the side of the building! Social media is NOT the answer.
It’s not as easy as 1-2-3,
but it’s also not complex and can be avoided.
If you haven’t been
disrupted yet… fastened the seat belts.
Onward!
No comments:
Post a Comment